<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Pachera Group &#187; Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thepacheragroup.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thepacheragroup.com</link>
	<description>Executive Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 17:54:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Yikes!  Turn off that social reading feature, please!</title>
		<link>http://thepacheragroup.com/vikki-pacheras-blog/yikes-turn-off-that-social-reading-feature-please/</link>
		<comments>http://thepacheragroup.com/vikki-pacheras-blog/yikes-turn-off-that-social-reading-feature-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 17:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vikki Pachera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vikki Pachera's Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepacheragroup.com/?p=1546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The newspaper business has been dying a slow death for some time.   I get it, some socially savvy marketer launched ‘social reading’ to help stimulate readership, at least online. I’m sure it sounded great in the executive suite but I think there should be a Federal Law that requires a big, huge pop up warning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The newspaper business has been dying a slow death for some time.   I get it, some socially savvy marketer launched ‘social reading’ to help stimulate readership, at least online. I’m sure it sounded great in the executive suite but I think there should be a Federal Law that requires a big, huge pop up warning if you’ve agreed to the service  that says something like, Hey! You are about to tell all of your Facebook friends that you are reading an article about Snookie, her baby bump and her bikini.  REALLY?  You want to do that?</p>
<p>I’ll be the first to admit, one of the perks of being a slave to the salon is getting to read all those fun, trashy magazines, getting caught up on the latest in pop culture.   I prefer to dowel out that education selectively.</p>
<p>But when I saw recently, several of my high-ranking friends reading about lipo, models without makeup and, my personal favorite, whether drinking causes you to be less smart, well, I’m thinking less of them despite my own little habit.  Sorry, can’t be helped.  There’s something so impactful as seeing Lipo next to a CTO’s name, it’s hard to erase the image.</p>
<p>Like all things in and around your personal brand, what you read is pretty important stuff.  Just ask Sarah Palin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepacheragroup.com/vikki-pacheras-blog/yikes-turn-off-that-social-reading-feature-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moving to Agile &#8211; Changing Work Dynamics</title>
		<link>http://thepacheragroup.com/career-development/moving-to-agile-changing-work-dynamics/</link>
		<comments>http://thepacheragroup.com/career-development/moving-to-agile-changing-work-dynamics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vikki Pachera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Career Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Search for Talent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vikki Pachera's Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepacheragroup.com/?p=1539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that every day someone tells me they want to work remotely, work from home.  That’s becoming less of an option for many. There’s been an interesting shift, most noticeably in the last year or so, where companies that have moved to the Agile development process require ‘all hands on deck.’  Product decisions are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that every day someone tells me they want to work remotely, work from home.  That’s becoming less of an option for many.</p>
<p>There’s been an interesting shift, most noticeably in the last year or so, where companies that have moved to the Agile development process require ‘all hands on deck.’  Product decisions are made in the moment on a daily basis in a less documented, more interactive fashion.  Being on the phone is tough and doesn’t cut it over the long term.</p>
<p>Companies competing in the consumer electronics space, in e-commerce, mobile, and healthcare are all in fast changing industries.  Being present often means being able to be part of the change, providing opportunities to talk to people, to help shape the new programs.</p>
<p>To an employer, the business comes first.  If someone can do the work remotely from time to time, that’s usually fine.  But few will sign up to a fixed schedule or go too far in accommodating personal needs.  No one can guarantee that Fridays (or Thursdays or Mondays) are days that nothing critical will happen.  Like it or not, the best companies generally need everyone on deck together at least 70% of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepacheragroup.com/career-development/moving-to-agile-changing-work-dynamics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Second Chance</title>
		<link>http://thepacheragroup.com/career-development/the-second-chance/</link>
		<comments>http://thepacheragroup.com/career-development/the-second-chance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vikki Pachera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Career Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Seekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Search for Talent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vikki Pachera's Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepacheragroup.com/?p=1535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News flash: Life isn’t fair. I’m hoping that you got the memo in the second grade and that’s not really a news flash. News flash: There are no second chances. OK, that’s not totally true, there are a number of great Hollywood romance movies that are built on the premise that you get a second chance. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News flash: Life isn’t fair. I’m hoping that you got the memo in the second grade and that’s not really a news flash.</p>
<p>News flash: There are no second chances. OK, that’s not totally true, there are a number of great Hollywood romance movies that are built on the premise that you get a second chance. You know the storyline, guy gets girl, guy screws up, guy makes up and world peace prevails.</p>
<p>Seriously though, there’s no second chance in an interview. It is not a casual event, it’s a command performance even if we call it a ‘coffee’ or ‘informational.’ From the moment you walk in (are you on time, what are you wearing, are you smiling, how’s your handshake) to the wrap up, it’s one big assessment.</p>
<p>So give yourself every chance to ‘nail it.’ If it’s a phone call, take the call from a land line, no dogs, kids or leaf blowers within a 2 block radius. If you have to take it on a cell, apologize, ask if the fidelity is acceptable and by all means pull over and never have anyone else in the car, including Fido.</p>
<p>If you can’t answer a question, that’s a problem. It’s better to admit it than to BS. And even better to ask for clarification than to make assumptions.</p>
<p>Unfortunately there’s never an email that you can send that fixes a botched interview. There’s no ‘do overs’ in the game of interviews.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepacheragroup.com/career-development/the-second-chance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our New Website</title>
		<link>http://thepacheragroup.com/blog/our-new-website/</link>
		<comments>http://thepacheragroup.com/blog/our-new-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vikki Pachera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Pachera Group Advantage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Search for Talent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vikki Pachera's Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepacheragroup.com/?p=1528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s funny how quickly things become dated.  Our nice, clean website served our firm well over the last 4 years. But as the war for talent continues to heat up, it is important to have a clear message that cuts through the noise.  We felt we needed a new ‘storefront.’ Our revised web presence gives [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s funny how quickly things become dated.  Our nice, clean website served our firm well over the last 4 years.</p>
<p>But as the war for talent continues to heat up, it is important to have a clear message that cuts through the noise.  We felt we needed a new ‘storefront.’</p>
<p>Our revised web presence gives everyone a better sense of who we are.  After all, this is a relationship-oriented business.  Our clients need to have trust and faith that we’ll deliver and that often translates into a 1:1 relationship.  We often introduce ourselves and an opportunity to our prospective candidates with an email.  Associating a name with a face, and, even better, getting a glimpse into someone’s interests cuts the ice.</p>
<p>We’ve also tightened up our communication, our value proposition and why we are different.  We lost the ‘thought leadership’ and academic pontificating tone that frankly we copied from our competitors.   Our new look is crisp, direct and a little more fun.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thepacheragroup.com">www.thepacheragroup.com</a></p>
<p>What do you think, have we hit the mark?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepacheragroup.com/blog/our-new-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 Resume Rules to Live By</title>
		<link>http://thepacheragroup.com/career-development/8-resume-rules-to-live-by/</link>
		<comments>http://thepacheragroup.com/career-development/8-resume-rules-to-live-by/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 20:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vikki Pachera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Career Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Seekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vikki Pachera's Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepacheragroup.com/?p=1523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Be beautiful. Nice formatting, fonts, appropriate use of bolding and colors (if you have to). Don’t let your resume look like a cheesy eBay offer. It should look like an Apple brochure. 2. If you go all ‘fancy pants’ on your resume and put it into a horizontal or highly-formatted look, be sure the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Be beautiful. Nice formatting, fonts, appropriate use of bolding and colors (if you have to). Don’t let your resume look like a cheesy eBay offer. It should look like an Apple brochure.</p>
<p>2. If you go all ‘fancy pants’ on your resume and put it into a horizontal or highly-formatted look, be sure the contact info like your phone number is easy to read. Not horizontal or on page 3, for example.</p>
<p>3. For that matter, be sure you have contact info &#8212; email and phone (your mobile) &#8211; on the resume!</p>
<p>4. Add your town but not your address. We can no longer depend on area codes to accurately reflect where a person resides. Relo may not be part of the deal, that’s one of many reasons we need to know where you live.</p>
<p>5. You do not have to add every single thing you ever did, every job you ever had. Don’t hide things but for example, nothing 15 years ago can be that relevant.</p>
<p>6. Never fib on titles, tenure, degrees, etc. We check. And you get DQ’d if there’s a big enough discrepancy. Big enough can’t be defined accurately so play it safe.</p>
<p>7. Format professionally. If English is a second language or if grammar isn&#8217;t your thing, ask someone or pay someone to help you.</p>
<p>8. You can keep some personality on the resume by adding your passion for sports or the arts but be careful&#8211; with all that triathlete training and volunteering, we might wonder where a career fits in the hierarchy.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepacheragroup.com/career-development/8-resume-rules-to-live-by/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Job Hopper</title>
		<link>http://thepacheragroup.com/uncategorized/the-job-hopper/</link>
		<comments>http://thepacheragroup.com/uncategorized/the-job-hopper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vikki Pachera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepacheragroup.com/?p=1517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four years ago, I would never have presented a candidate whose resume had a distinct pattern of changing jobs before the two year mark. Everyone got a pass on the blustery days of the bubble, ’98-01 but that was it. That policy is now under review. While I still think the serial 18 month stints does, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four years ago, I would never have presented a candidate whose resume had a distinct pattern of changing jobs before the two year mark. Everyone got a pass on the blustery days of the bubble, ’98-01 but that was it.</p>
<p>That policy is now under review. While I still think the serial 18 month stints does, more often than not, represent a problem (six months to come up to speed on a job, six months to do it&#8212;by the one year mark managers are generally ‘on to’ people who aren’t cutting it, six months of performance management and bingo, we’re at the 18 month point), things today not as cut and dry.</p>
<p>A lot of people have a very high tolerance to risk &#8211; perhaps they aren’t driven by a steady paycheck, maybe they are in search of the next Facebook, Box or Yelp. Those folks roll the dice on riskier companies that don’t always make it.</p>
<p>More people are consulting &#8212; test driving opportunities or just raking in higher compensation, particularly in some disciplines more than others. Their resume can look very choppy.</p>
<p>So as I evaluate the resume, the conversation becomes more direct—when did you leave and why? Was it performance related?  How long do you like to be at one company?</p>
<p>As a candidate, anticipating those questions and being honest about the situation is the only way to go.   The questions will come up, and the right answers will move you forward.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepacheragroup.com/uncategorized/the-job-hopper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presenting Your Next VP</title>
		<link>http://thepacheragroup.com/uncategorized/presenting-your-next-vp/</link>
		<comments>http://thepacheragroup.com/uncategorized/presenting-your-next-vp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vikki Pachera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepacheragroup.com/?p=1512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether you are a senior engineer, designer, in marketing or sales, or a CXO, it’s now commonplace to be asked to do a presentation during interviews for a new job. Often, just after you've been escorted in and offered the standard coffee or water, you’re on deck to present *something* to the hiring team.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We used to talk in financial terms about the high cost of a bad hire. Now, ‘mis-hires’ are seen as a huge setback to velocity. The speed at which business runs and the lean structures in place make a bad hire not just costly, but a nightmare, often a major setback to a brand overhaul, to getting stability injected into e-commerce, or a blow to a product development cycle.</p>
<p>Whether you are a senior engineer, designer, in marketing or sales, or a CXO, it’s now commonplace to be asked to do a presentation during interviews for a new job. Often, just after you&#8217;ve been escorted in and offered the standard coffee or water, you’re on deck to present *something* to the hiring team.</p>
<p>The team gathered before you is assessing your presence.  Determining if you are compelling. They are looking for style—are you an analytic, creative, funny or serious? Are you appropriate for their culture? And, of course, whether it’s a summary of your career or an overview of a project, are they interested in your content?</p>
<p>But most of all, they are assessing whether you can take the ball and run with it. Clearly, in our accelerated pace, that’s a key component of success. Hiring someone who needs too much time to assess or needs too much direction may not be the best hire.</p>
<p>Presentations are a useful tool in the hiring process, far more so than a random series of 1/1 sessions. Companies get more texture and insight into a candidate. As for candidates, the more vetted you are, the better your odds of success should you land the role.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepacheragroup.com/uncategorized/presenting-your-next-vp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protect Your Brand: Resign Quietly</title>
		<link>http://thepacheragroup.com/blog/protect-your-brand-resign-quietly/</link>
		<comments>http://thepacheragroup.com/blog/protect-your-brand-resign-quietly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Firing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Seekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Pachera Group Advantage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepacheragroup.com/?p=1504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg Smith’s very public, and indeed scathing, resignation from Goldman Sachs has certainly garnered a lot of attention in the past few days. But, I would suggest that attention will quickly fade and Mr. Smith’s decision to go out with a bang will do little good. Certainly not to himself, and doubtfully to his former [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg Smith’s very public, and indeed scathing, resignation from Goldman Sachs has certainly garnered a lot of attention in the past few days. But, I would suggest that attention will quickly fade and Mr. Smith’s decision to go out with a bang will do little good. Certainly not to himself, and doubtfully to his former colleagues at Goldman or their customers.</p>
<p>While he has pointed out potential (and I’d agree highly likely) flaws in his previous employer’s business practices, it’s seems to me that he may have damaged his own brand reputation more than that of Goldman’s. By attaching his criticisms to his resignation, his credibility instantly becomes a target.</p>
<p>We’ve all likely thought about how to leave a firm – and perhaps are tempted to offer our own two cents. Publicly or otherwise. I’ve been asked this question constantly as a recruiter: “How do I leave?” The answer: “Quietly. And with respect.”</p>
<p>A resignation is not the time to be a martyr. It may provide an immediate sense of satisfaction to your emotional side, but that upside is about as effective for your long-term career health as a sugar high.</p>
<p>Don’t damage your own brand in a heroic attempt to salvage another.</p>
<p><a href="http://on.wsj.com/yWjCPN">http://on.wsj.com/yWjCPN</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepacheragroup.com/blog/protect-your-brand-resign-quietly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Corporate Culture is Not Expenseive&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://thepacheragroup.com/blog/corporate-culture-is-not-expenseive/</link>
		<comments>http://thepacheragroup.com/blog/corporate-culture-is-not-expenseive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 21:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paula Lerzak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Search for Talent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepacheragroup.com/?p=1498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just sent an outstanding candidate to a start-up for a first round interview.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inc.com/paul-spiegelman/great-corporate-culture-is-not-expensive.html">http://www.inc.com/paul-spiegelman/great-corporate-culture-is-not-expensive.html</a></p>
<p>Well said! I just sent an outstanding candidate to a start-up for a first round interview.</p>
<p>His feedback? The place “had no vibe”  and he could practically hear crickets because it was so quiet.  Not exactly a great impression.</p>
<p>Fortunately, the candidate is intrigued enough by the opportunity that he will be heading back for next rounds.   I will be sure to mention the importance of creating a great corporate culture to my client.   Don&#8217;t want anyone walking away for the wrong (and fixable) reason!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepacheragroup.com/blog/corporate-culture-is-not-expenseive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roles Not Jobs</title>
		<link>http://thepacheragroup.com/tpg-advantage/roles-not-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://thepacheragroup.com/tpg-advantage/roles-not-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 19:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gwen Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Pachera Group Advantage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepacheragroup.com/?p=1493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article by Maren Hogan that is super relevant in today’s market.  Astute hiring managers understand that hot candidates seek out compelling roles where they are responsible for projects and not simply functions.  Furthermore, they understand that such a desire leads to shorter tenure or what we’ve referred to in the past as “job-hopping”.  That [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article by Maren Hogan that is super relevant in today’s market.  Astute hiring managers understand that hot candidates seek out compelling roles where they are responsible for projects and not simply functions.  Furthermore, they understand that such a desire leads to shorter tenure or what we’ve referred to in the past as “job-hopping”.  That once feared notion is finding itself embraced more and more in markets where expertise, rather than experience, is invaluable.</p>
<p>While great for the employee, employers simply can’t ignore the high cost of turnover.  One way to combat that and entice top talent to stay after the project is finished – create bridges to other challenging roles, rather than hierarchical career ladders.  Understand what they want to conquer next and find, or create, that role in your organization.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.recruiter.com/articles/from-jobs-to-roles-who-we-are-at-work-is-changing/">From Jobs to Roles: Who We are at Work is Changing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepacheragroup.com/tpg-advantage/roles-not-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

